Too true. High value women" have youth and beauty as their value. A man has "income, or status." To see why one of those is worth less (therefore she is a gold-digger) one has to realize that, oddly, it's wrong to value money if it is paid to him first.

Her loyalty in exchange for security is always suspect. Why? Because it is "his" money even if she works, cares, shares her body and love, for it.

When we threaten a man's income she is evil. When we threaten a woman's exchange for it, devaluing her youth and beauty, he is "not evil."